Some highlights of the notice on the pilot of the

2022-10-01
  • Detail

Some highlights of the notice on the pilot of market-oriented transaction of distributed generation

the notice on the pilot of market-oriented transaction of distributed generation issued by the national development and Reform Commission and the National Energy Administration on October 31 has some interesting highlights and updated the views of many people. Here I excerpt one or two and make a simple analysis for your reference. Please correct any mistakes

I. what is distributed generation? "Distributed generation refers to the small and medium-sized power generation facilities connected to the distribution operation and the nearby consumption of power generation". There are three key words here. The first is to connect to the power distribution operation, that is, in the future, pay Jinan experimental machine factory Jinan trial money to answer all your doubts. The easy range is limited to power distribution; The second is to consume nearby, breaking through the original policy boundary of spontaneous self use or full amount; Third, the scale of the project is small and medium-sized, and the voltage below 20MW does not exceed 35kV, and the voltage below 50MW does not exceed 110kV

second, what is the relationship between distributed generation and energy storage and multi energy complementarity? "Multi energy complementary construction can be adopted, and distributed generation projects are encouraged to install energy storage facilities to improve the flexibility and stability of power supply". In the document of market-oriented transaction, multi energy complementarity and energy storage are proposed, which means that the future transaction based on micro electricity rather than a single distributed power generation is a trend, which also brings opportunities for the subsequent commercialization of energy storage and multi energy complementarity

three trading modes. The first is the transaction between the project and power users; The second is to entrust power enterprises to sell electricity; The third is the acquisition of electric enterprises. However, in practice, the first transaction mode requires direct transactions between projects and power users. From the perspective of transaction rules, there seems to be no agency space for power selling companies. For a large number of small and medium-sized projects, even household distributed projects, whether there is the possibility of centralized virtualization transactions in the future deserves further attention. The second and third transaction modes are entrusted to power companies for transactions, so how can power companies have the motivation to help power generation projects find power users, rather than adopting the direct acquisition mode across the board? This problem also needs to be explored in the follow-up operation

IV. about the trading platform. The notice mentioned that the pilot areas can set up sub modules of city (county) level distributed generation trading platform, and can also be traded by city (county) level dispatching agencies or incremental distribution operation agencies. There are two interesting aspects. One is the trading platform of distributed generation, which is the third level (the first level is inter provincial and inter district, and the second level is provincial) and is set up by cities and counties. This is a certain form of the future power retail market, not the wholesale market. The second is that incremental distribution enterprises can set up distributed generation trading platforms. The significance of incremental distribution, which we have been analyzing before, begins to reflect: that is, to form new business models and service forms around incremental distribution, and distributed generation trading platforms are one of them

v. about transaction settlement. Power enterprises are responsible for the measurement of trading electricity and the collection of electricity charges, and power enterprises and power dispatching agencies are responsible for the balance of electricity and the adjustment of deviation electricity. Combined with the policy of the previous article, we can find that the default implicit logic of incremental distribution enterprise = power enterprise still exists in the distributed market-oriented transaction, that is, within the scope of incremental distribution, it is the incremental distribution enterprise that builds the distributed trading market and settles. Of course, this involves that the experimental machine will carry out the tensile test with the set steps (another interesting problem after the software prompt with extension is removed is that no matter the two or incremental distribution enterprises, they can't invest in projects and conduct transaction settlement in the name of the company. To put it bluntly, they can't invoice or settle for themselves. The deeper problem is how to ensure that different project investors conduct transactions fairly in distributed market-oriented transactions, which involves how to maintain the energy regulatory department According to the statistics of institutions, the fairness of transactions has been improved

Copyright © 2011 JIN SHI